Thursday, December 30, 2004
Wednesday, December 29, 2004
Chickadees Unite!
Tuesday, December 28, 2004
Thursday, December 23, 2004
All the stockings . . .
Wednesday, December 22, 2004
Good Nisse, God Jul
Tuesday, December 21, 2004
In Praise of Pagans
Monday, December 20, 2004
Cry Baby
Thursday, December 16, 2004
Bringing On a Snow Job
That's not a lie, it's a terminological inexactitude. Also, a tactical misrepresentation.
~ Alexander Haig ~
A new report from the US Department of Education shows that charter school children perform no better, and in many cases worse, than their counterparts in regular public schools. The findings of this latest report largely confirm earlier statistics released by the American Federation of Teachers.
Care to learn just what kind of spin the deputy education secretary, Eugene W. Hickok, put on this report in his news conference?
"In case there's any doubt, we are big supporters of charter schools," Dr. Hickok said. "So as I read these studies on charter schools, I read them through that lens." He went on to say that the scores were "not a bad sign" and "in many ways charter students are holding their own."
WOW! Holding their own . . .
Wait a sec. Ummmm, Dr. Hickok? Is "holding their own" against regular public schools a new measure of success for the Education Department? Am I the only one who remembers that the argument for shifting education funds to charter schools was to end up with HIGHER performing students?
I think I'm gonna lose it. Thank goodness my escape valve for this weekend is a three day ski trip with GHIW and friends Steve & Sara from Chicago. Good friends, good food, good snow - and a respite from the professional snow jobs being lobbed at me every morning.
Enjoy your weekend, everyone.
Wednesday, December 15, 2004
Bozone Alert
Bozone (n.): The substance surrounding stupid people that stops bright ideas from penetrating
A bozone alert was issued in Cuba today, chiefly affecting US Foreign Mission chief James Cason and members of Fidel Castro's government. The warning comes as both parties verbally spar over a display of Christmas decorations outside the US mission building. The offending display includes a large Frosty the Snowman, a Santa Claus, white lights in palm trees and a sign bearing the number 75.
According to Cason, "we . . . displayed a '75' symbol as a reminder of those arrested for thinking and speaking independently," referring to 75 pro-democracy activists imprisoned by the Cuban government. Cuban officials have reportedly warned Cason to take the display down or "there will be consequences."
Cason clarified that "thinking and speaking independently" is valued in communist-run countries, but dissidents in democratic countries are subject to suppression and investigation as called for in the US Patriot Act.
Special thanks to faithful reader, Patricia, for sending the winning entries from this year's Washington Post Style Invitational word contest.
Tuesday, December 14, 2004
A Minor Christmas Note
pah-rum-pah-pah-rum The blog de la resistance reader's poll verdict is in and "Little Drummer Boy" takes the prize as the most annoying Christmas song. You knew it all along, didn't you?
I think it must be something about my eastern european Polish heritage that makes me love the most unhappy music. I mean, really, the Poles can't help but embrace tragedy and sorrow. Just look at their country's sad history for chrissakes. So then, my favorite Christmas song is really an advent song, (too sad for Christmas) "Oh Come, Oh Come Emanuel."
Oy, all those minor notes make me weep. Why can't someone put together an entire CD of every possible version and rendition of this song? Is it too much to ask?
Monday, December 13, 2004
Liberal Hijackings?
I know the week is off to a good start when I nearly spew a mouthful of Monday morning coffee onto my keyboard upon discovering a few paragraphs like this in an article about the emboldened religious right in the NYTimes:
State Representative Cynthia Davis of Missouri prefiled two bills for the next session of the Legislature that she said "reflect what people want." One would remove the state's requirement that all forms of contraception and their potential health effects be taught in schools, leaving the focus on abstinence. Another would require publishers that sell biology textbooks to Missouri to include at least one chapter with alternative theories to evolution.
"These are common-sense, grass-roots ideas from the people I represent, and I'd be very surprised if a majority of legislators didn't feel they were the right solutions to these problems," Ms. Davis said.
"It's like when the hijackers took over those four planes on Sept. 11 and took people to a place where they didn't want to go," she added. "I think a lot of people feel that liberals have taken our country somewhere we don't want to go. I think a lot more people realize this is our country and we're going to take it back."
What the . . .? Liberal=Terrorist? The woman got elected with a mouth like that?
" . . . liberals have taken our country somewhere we don't want to go."
Anyone out there have a damned clue what liberals and which legislation in the past twenty-five years she's talking about?
My head is about to blow off and I've got to go pop a couple of painkillers.
Friday, December 10, 2004
Cats, Love & Tears
Thursday, December 09, 2004
Kinsey, Sex & Graham Crackers
Creationism in our schools, abstinence-only sex education, "reproductive rights" on the list of can't-say-that-on-television phrases, the mediocre movie "Kinsey" a flashpoint for the religious right; has the rational mind disappeared from our culture entirely? Frank Rich, in today's NYTimes, http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/arts/12rich.html?th makes a compelling case that science and reason are in jeopardy with the ascension of the "moral values" crowd:
" . . . off-screen Americans are being damaged by the cultural war over sex that is being played out in real life. You see that when struggling kids are denied the same information about sexuality that was kept from their antecedents in the pre-Kinsey era; you see that when pharmacists in more and more states enforce their own "moral values" by refusing to fill women's contraceptive prescriptions and do so with the tacit or official approval of local officials; you see it when basic information that might prevent the spread of lethal diseases is suppressed by the government because it favors political pandering over scientific fact. "
Strangely enough, this morning I came across an obscure note about the inventor Sylvester Graham who, in the 19th century, invented the graham cracker as a suppressant for what he viewed as the hyperactive American libido.
Hmmmm . . . maybe there's a new slogan here for our government funded sex education programs. "Abstain & Graham-It"
Wednesday, December 08, 2004
Ribbons for Rumsfeld
Tuesday, December 07, 2004
The Red Jihad
In today's NYTimes, columnist David Brooks defines a growing demographic in the United States as "natalists," couples who marry young, have three, four or more children and have set-up more gender traditional families in the exurbs of the Plains states and the Southwest.
"Natalists," says Brooks, "are associated with red America, but they're not launching a jihad."
Well, I guess it depends on how you define "jihad." By definition, these natalists have dropped out, shunned cities and urban problems and surrounded themselves with sameness. You've seen it, shopping malls dominated by national chains, cookie-cutter houses, everyone driving the same models of SUV's and minivans, everyone's natalist family looking much the same, acting much the same as any other family in the exurb. For them, sameness is comfort and security.
And they vote. In large, dependable numbers. And, because of their drop-out, leave-me-alone-with-my-family mentality, they are easily manipulated with fear tactics. Isolated in a world of their own making, they vote against measures that would improve the lives of the less fortunate. They don't come in contact with anyone struggling to make ends meet by working two minimum wage jobs. They don't know anyone who can't go to a doctor because they won't be able to afford to pay for an office call, much less a diagnostic test or a prescription drug.
They know their world, and their world looks and acts just like them. And when they vote, they vote against the "other" that they do not know and never see.
Natalists may be casting their vote with pure loving hearts - for their own families and neighbors - but the result is the same, intolerance for difference.
Sounds like "jihad" to me.
For the Brooks editorial in its entirety :
//www.nytimes.com/2004/12/07/opinion/07brooks.html?hp
Monday, December 06, 2004
Saturday, December 04, 2004
Toodle-ooo Tommy
Sometimes, these blog entries write themselves.
Headline in this morning's paper: Thompson Quits With Warning
Our nation's Secretary of Health and Human Services, Tommy Thompson resigned yesterday with the following warning: "I, for the life of me, cannot understand why the terrorists have not attacked our food supply because it is so easy to do."
Um, excuse me Secretary Thompson, wasn't it your job to make it DIFFICULT for terrorists to tamper with our food supply?
Reportedly, Thompson would like his next job to be "running a really big company." It will be fun to see which "really big company" will hire a guy who not only failed to perform his last job, but bragged about his failure.
There is a proud Wisconsin tradition of our ex-governors being appointed to cushy positions within local insurance companies. Maybe Tommy can get a job where he's in charge of risk assessment.
Friday, December 03, 2004
Your Fiendly Pharmacist
Ah, the good old days. A woman goes to her doctor. The doctor prescribes a drug. The woman takes the script to her pharmacy. The pharmacist fills the prescription and warns her about possible side effects and how to properly take the drug.
If this is still the manner in which you obtain your necessary prescriptions, count yourself fortunate. If the Christian Pharmacists Fellowship International organization (and other groups like it) have their way, you may find yourself face to face with a trained evangelist pharmacist. Here is some of what the Christian Pharmacists will be learning at the upcoming Saline Solution Conference:
Evangelism Training: Saline Solution Conferences
How to share spiritual truth in 20 seconds
How to discuss spiritual matters in a way that is comfortable and ethical
How to inspire your staff to make your practice site a great place to be
How to take a spiritual history
How and when to write faith prescriptions
How to develop a spiritual consult network
How to avoid backing up the waiting room
How to share the gospel in three minutes
My spiritual history? A faith prescription? What the ?
If you think organizations like this are wacko-fringe elements, guess again. Pharmacists actually get CEU credit for attending conferences with lectures titled, "Is It Wise to Deny God Admission to Pharmacy School?"
I'm scared. How about you?
Thursday, December 02, 2004
Blue in a Blue State
Tom Ridge is leaving. John Ashcroft, too. The only cartoon mullah left in the Bush White House is Wisconsin's own Tommy Thompson.
Four years ago, I was glad to see Tommy leave for his post in the Department of Health and Human Services. Then came September 11, anthrax and most recently, the bungled flu vaccine crisis. In the year 2000, most of us in Wisconsin knew he'd be in WAY over his head at DHHS. We had no idea how deep the water would get in the four years since his move to Washington.
The Bush administration is smartly cleaning house. Tommy will certainly be following Ridge and Ashcroft out the door. Then what? Will he once again eye the governor's office here at home?
I've got to say that, happy as I was to see him leave, the new, younger Republicans rumored to be considering the governor's seat in 2006 are a far scarier lot than Tommy ever was. John Gard and Scott Walker are positively reptilian. They make the dull-witted and philandering Tommy look like a harmless folksy grandpa in comparison.
Sadly, there is much resistance work ahead.
Wednesday, December 01, 2004
Kill Poncho
What is it with ponchos? The damn things are everywhere and I just don't understand the appeal. OK, maybe if you spend your day sitting on the back of a donkey or wandering mountain paths with a pan pipe, they might make sense. But, here in Wisconsin, draped across the shoulders of a busy fifty-year old woman, they are totally ridiculous.
They aren't warm enough to wear as outerwear, except for maybe three weeks in the spring and another three weeks in the fall. They are totally impractical if you drive a car - always catching on things, impeding movement and making it impossible to find the seat belt latch. Sling a bag over your shoulder or try finding your car keys while balancing a bag of groceries? Forget it.
Ponchos are a fashion RESIST if ever there was one.